Exact Answer: 6 to 8 Hours
Edibles are marijuana-infused foods or beverages. They are used as an alternative to smoking or vaping cannabis since they transfer cannabinoids to the body through the mouth and digestive system.
Tetrahydrocannabinol-containing edibles produce a comparable high or euphoric sensation as smoking cannabis. Edibles are a more potent way to distribute these cannabinoids in some respects.
Edibles also avoid some of the drawbacks of smoking marijuana, such as continuous coughing and phlegm production. However, determining how much to take might be difficult because everyone’s body reacts differently to different doses.
How Long Do Edibles Last?
| Tolerance Level | Impact Duration |
| Low | 8-12 Hours |
| High | 4 Hours |
When compared to smoking or vaping, edibles take a long time to kick in, but they also stay a lot longer. The average edible dose can last up to 6 hours, with the peak effects appearing roughly 3 hours after ingestion.
This, too, will depend on a number of parameters, including dosage, metabolism, and tolerance levels. Because the body takes time to filter THC out of the system, taking a large amount or a dose with high THC levels can result in a higher, longer high.
Individual tolerance levels will also play a significant role in this. If they consume the same dose, people who aren’t habituated to cannabis products may experience the effects considerably more powerfully and for much longer than those who are.
Tolerance levels can also change over time depending on how much cannabis a person has smoked or consumed. Again, metabolism may be a factor, and someone with a rapid metabolism may not experience the effects for as long as someone with a slower metabolism.
The high from an edible will most likely last a few hours in most cases. The effects of edibles endure roughly 6–8 hours, according to the authors of the review research.
However, if the person is sensitive, the high can continue up to 8–12 hours, but only about 4 hours if the person has a higher tolerance.
Why Do Edibles Last That Long?
The body produces distinct THC by-products depending on the route of consumption, which is why edibles last so long.
The amount of THC or CBD in a single serving is stated on most edible cannabis products. A single gummy, for example, contains 10 milligrams (mg) of THC.
However, in other circumstances, the THC or CBD content of the entire package or food item is listed. In the case of gummies, a package may contain 100 milligrams of THC. If a box has ten candies, each one contains 10 mg.
With foods like brownies and cookies, this can be extremely perplexing. It could suggest that a single dose equates to a fraction of the item in some circumstances.
THC edibles produce a similar high, as well as feelings of relaxation and happiness, as smoking the molecule. The high will differ depending on the edible’s cannabinoids and overall potency.
Some people prefer edibles versus smoking to prevent harming their lungs, while others enjoy the high that an edible provides.
Cannabis products are safe, and the risk of a dangerous overdose is very minimal. It is possible to consume too much THC, which can result in unpleasant side effects.
Overdosing on THC is more likely with edibles since, unlike smoking, the body does not provide any warning indications. It’s too late by the time any signs of overdosing appear since the body has already begun to absorb the food.
Conclusion
It can be difficult to take edibles correctly. Because everyone’s tolerance levels differ, an effective dose for one person may be too high for another.
Edibles are particularly challenging to quantify because, unlike cigarettes, there is no way of knowing how impactful a dose is until the edible is broken down by the body.
People are more likely to overdose on edibles than on cannabis cigarettes. Overdosing by eating an edible is rarely a reason for alarm, however, it can result in some unsettling symptoms.
Anyone experiencing severe symptoms, such as panic attacks, a racing heart, or trouble breathing, should seek medical help.
References
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-010-0434-1
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00094056.1928.10723335
- https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3732/ajb.1400352
I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️
This is a fantastic overview of the topic at hand, and it provides a thorough examination of THC edibles.
The article is overly optimistic about the safety of THC edibles, leading to a potential underestimation of the risks involved.
I agree, the safety of THC edibles is not as clear-cut as the article makes it out to be.
You make a good point. The article should have provided a more balanced view on the safety of THC edibles.
This article was a wild ride, filled with educational insights and intriguing facts. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.
The information provided in this article is enlightening, and it encourages a deeper understanding of the topic at hand.
You’re right, the information here is quite thought-provoking.
The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the topic, drawing attention to the importance of understanding the effects and potential risks of THC edibles.
I completely agree, this article is an eye-opener about THC edibles.
Absolutely, the article shines a light on the need for a nuanced understanding of THC edibles.
This article lacks the depth and critical engagement that are crucial when discussing the complexities of THC edibles.
I see what you’re saying, the article could have delved deeper into the intricacies of THC edibles.
While the article offers valuable insights into the duration and impact of THC edibles, it would have benefitted from a discussion of potential long-term effects.
You raise an interesting point. Long-term effects are an important aspect to consider when discussing THC edibles.
This article contains a wealth of information about THC edibles. It’s very informative, but it seems to be missing a few sources.
I agree, the absence of sources is inconvenient.
I found the tone of the article to be a bit condescending and not conducive to a productive discussion on the topic.
I understand what you’re saying, the article could have been more neutral in its tone.
The article is well-researched and presents its findings in a clear and structured manner.
Yes, the structure of the article is very effective.
Agreed, the information was delivered in a very organized fashion.