How Long Did it Take to Build Rome (And Why)?

How Long Did it Take to Build Rome (And Why)?

Exact Answer: 1000 years

People across the world use the phrase Rome was not built in a day as a reminder to be patient. Building Rome took plenty of time, and most of us would like to know the duration taken to build this fascinating ancient city.

Therefore, in today’s article, we shall be answering the question of how long did it take to build Rome.

How Long Did it Take to Build Rome

How Long Did it Take to Build Rome?

Roman BuildingTime
The Roman ForumMillenium 
The Colosseum10 years
The Pantheon12 years
Castel Sant’Angelo1,400 years 

The timeframe that took to build Rome cannot be quantified. You can as well say that Rome is still under construction. This city had experienced cycles of constructions and demolition since 753BCE when it was found.

Rome features different sites; therefore, you can quantify individual sections on a specific timeframe. Here are some of the famous sites in Rome and the amount of time taken to construct;

The Roman Forum

Ancient Rome is considered as the center of civic life. The Roman Forum developed progressively over a millennium. The construction process began in the late 8th century BC through the early 7th century AD.

The temple of Castor and Pollux are among the earliest Roman Forum monuments that exist till today. These monuments date back to 494 BC. The Column of Phocas was the last monument to be erected in the Roman Forum on August 608 AD.

temple of Castor and Pollux

The Colosseum

Colosseum construction started in 70 AD. This arena is known as Flavian Amphitheater which was opened to spectators in 80 AD. This is one of the most enduring symbols of Italy and it to 10 years to construct it. Its construction is said to have been carried out by 100,000 Jewish slaves.

The Pantheon

Pantheon was erected for use as a temple during the era of Augustus. In the year 80, the Augustan Pantheon caught on ablaze and got destroyed. This was the year that the Colosseum was inaugurated.

Another construction of Pantheon took place and was once again destroyed by fire in the year 110. The current Pantheon was constructed within 12 years between the year 113 and the year 125.

Castel Sant’Angelo

This site took over 1,400 years to build. The building is round in shape, and it is also known as a medieval fortress. However, it stands on top of Hadrian’s Mausoleum that was constructed between 123 AD and 139 AD.

Castel Sant’Angelo

This building was built as a prison, fortress, and home for fleeing Popes as well as an archive for treasures of Vatican.


How long did it take to build Rome will depend on how you interpret the question. This is because Rome has been constructed and destroyed a couple of times. You can consider working out the finite existence of various versions of Rome and come up with a substantial number.

You can as well contemplate Rome as a city that is under construction since 21st April 753 BCE when it was found. With these statistics, you can conclude that Rome has taken approximately 1,010,450 days to be constructed.


dot 1
One request?

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

27 thoughts on “How Long Did it Take to Build Rome (And Why)?”

  1. The ongoing discourse around the construction duration of Rome underscores the complexity of its historical narrative and the evolving nature of historical research.

    1. The ever-evolving perspectives on Rome’s construction offer thought-provoking insights into historical research.

  2. The ambiguous nature of Rome’s construction timeline adds an intriguing layer to its historical narrative, making it an endlessly captivating subject of research.

  3. It’s fascinating that the construction of Rome is tied to ancient history, and the evolution of the city through the years is truly remarkable.

  4. The construction time of these iconic structures like the Colosseum and the Pantheon is impressive and it’s amazing how they’ve stood the test of time.

  5. The construction of Rome is definitely a fascinating topic. The fact that the city is still under construction even makes it more interesting. I think the amount of time it took to build the city is relative, so we can’t have an exact answer.

    1. You’re right. It’s interesting to think of Rome as a city always evolving, with a history that spans millennia.

  6. I think it’s incredible that the construction timeline of Rome spans centuries, and the city’s enduring presence is a testament to its significance.

  7. Rome’s construction has left an indelible mark on history, and the ongoing discoveries only add to its enigmatic allure.

  8. The complex history and construction timeline of Rome make it an incredibly enthralling subject of study and exploration.

    1. The evolution of Rome’s construction is an intricate tapestry of human ingenuity and innovation.

  9. The enigmatic nature of Rome’s construction timeline continues to spark lively debates and scholarly discussions, adding to the allure of this timeless subject.

    1. The multifaceted nature of Rome’s construction timeline invites diverse perspectives and interpretations, making it a compelling area of study.

    2. Absolutely, the ongoing research on Rome’s construction provides a captivating lens into historical inquiry.

  10. The historical context of Rome’s construction is quite intriguing and the legacy of its architectural marvels continues to captivate us.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *